Constitutional norm for jurist as SC judge unmet: Justice Bhuyan | India News

Supreme court justice ujjal bhuyan.jpg


Constitutional norm for jurist as SC judge unmet: Justice Bhuyan
SC judge says Article 124(3) provision for appointing distinguished jurists as apex court judges remains unused for 76 years.

NEW DELHI: Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, a Supreme Court judge, Sunday said though Article 124(3) permitted appointment of ‘distinguished jurists’ as judges of the apex court, it was regrettable that this provision had remained one of our Constitution’s unused mandates.“No jurist has been appointed so far to SC though Constitution has completed more than 76 years,” he said, adding that either Centre earlier or the collegium thereafter was not convinced about the depth in Indian academia or had not seriously explored Article 124(3) so far.Addressing the convocation of LLM students at National Law University, Delhi, Justice Bhuyan said, “No legal academic has yet been appointed as a judge of SC, despite there being brilliant minds who could have made a substantial contribution had they become part of the bench.”Addressing the ‘lack of practical experience’ argument against elevation of jurists as judges, he said, “SC is not only the highest adjudicatory body but it is the moral, legal and constitutional conscience-keeper of the nation. It is above technicalities.”

Share your thoughts in the comments